Skip to main content

Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (HSIRB)

The HSIRB reviews all Moravian College student, faculty, and administration 
research proposals that involve human beings as subjects.

2019-2020 members of the Moravian IRB:

  • Dr. Sara Benham, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Dr. Paulette Dorney, Department of Nursing
  • Dr. Tristan Gleason, Department of Education (Spring 2020, only)
  • Dr. Kathleen Gray, Department of Nursing
  • Dr. Karen Groller, Department of Nursing
  • Ms. Deb Halliday, Department of Nursing
  • Dr. Louise Keegan, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Dr. Susana Keller, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Dr. Akbar Keshodkar, Department of Sociology
  • Dr. Jennifer Ostrowski, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Dr. Ann Marie Potter, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Dr. Mary Anne Riopel, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences

Executive board:

  • Dr. Sarah Johnson, Department of Psychology
  • Dr. Debra Wetcher-Hendricks, Department of Sociology
  • Dr. David Wilkenfeld, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences

Forms and information for proposers:

  • All faculty who submit proposals or who sponsor student proposals must complete CITI training and submit the certificate of completion. Precisely what courses are required for different constituents is under discussion. That info will be posted here as soon as it is determined. The CITI training courses can be found at  CITI Program – Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative
  • Moravian College Human Subjects Policy: This 22-page document lists all the rules informing the functioning of the HSIRB committee.  You can refer to this document if you have specific questions about different aspects of the research design and/or committee review process, or if you would like to review core conditions of ethical research design.
  • HSIRB Proposal Form: This is the primary form completed by the researcher which provides details about the research project.  All proposers must complete and submit this form. 
  • HSIRB Exemption Request Form: This form is available for researchers who believe they qualify as exempt from IRB review. Standard exemption categories are listed in this form. All research with human participants that is considered exempt from IRB review should still be submitted to the IRB via this form to confirm exemption status.
  • HSIRB Informed Consent Template: This form is intended to help proposer draft their informed consent form/letter.  This template outlines all of the information that proposers must provide in order to assure informed consent. 
  • HSIRB Consent Form Instructions: This form provides some additional information on drafting the informed consent document. 
  • HSIRB Tips: Other helpful tips as proposers draft their proposals.
  • HSIRB Guidelines for Student Proposers: This document provides guidelines to students who may be navigating the research proposal process for the first time. 
  • Ethical Issues in Research on Illegal Activities

Complete proposals include:

  1. A completed HSIRB proposal form submitted as a Word or pdf document (we will not review Google Drive documents or other kinds of documents that can be changed during the review process).  
  2. Informed consent document(s)
  3. Copies or links to all research instruments, and copyright clearance if using copyrighted instruments 
  4. Copies of debriefing materials if and only if the proposal involves deception.

Incomplete proposals will be returned to the proposer before review and this will delay the review process.  Poorly constructed, error-ridden proposals will also be returned so please be sure to proofread your proposal before submission.

Submit all of your forms electronically to:

hsirb@moravian.edu

Please make sure that ALL of your proposal materials are sent collectively in one email submission, otherwise the review process will be delayed. 

Timing of the review process:

During the standard academic calendar, the HSIRB committee reviews proposals on a rolling basis. Given the large volume of proposals we receive from faculty, Honors students, other undergraduate students and graduate students, it typically takes us 2-3 weeks to complete an initial review of a completed proposal. Please note that the proposal may not be sent out for review the day it is received. Many proposals often require some edits/modifications before we can grant full approval and the revision process often adds an additional week+ to the review process, for a total turn-around time of 3-4 weeks. The majority of proposals will be fully reviewed within 1 month, but proposals that are submitted incomplete, with many editing errors, or with substantial clarity problems may take longer. The time-frame for completing the review depends substantially on how quickly the proposal author responds with any requested revisions.

Proposers should keep this time frame in mind as they plan their research projects. Students who are completing a research project for a class must pay close attention and submit their research proposals in the first few weeks of the semester to assure adequate time for review and revision. Honors students should make sure their proposals are submitted well ahead of the time when they plan to conduct their research. Proposals can be submitted over winter break and summer, but the review time-frame may be extended as IRB members are not always available at those times to review immediately.

Some Helpful Websites:

Protecting Human Research Participants

NIH Institute for Extramural Research
Link to PHRP Online Course 
http://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php

This online course is designed to prepare investigators involved in the design and/or conduct of research involving human subjects to understand their obligations to protect the rights and welfare of subjects in research. The course material presents basic concepts, principles, and issues related to the protection of research participants.  At the end of the course, participants can obtain a certificate that verifies that they have reviewed all of the course material. 

Upon completion of this course, you should be able to:

  • Describe the history and importance of human subjects protections
  • Identify research activities that involve human subjects
  • Discover the risks a research project might pose to participants
  • Understand how to minimize the risks posed by a research project
  • Describe additional protections needed for vulnerable populations
  • Understand additional issues that should be considered for international research
  • Describe appropriate procedures for recruiting research participants and obtaining informed consent
  • Identify the different committees that monitor human subjects protections
  • Understand the importance of study design in the protection of research participants
  • The first module examines significant historical events that have contributed to the way we view the protections for participants in clinical research today.

The Belmont Report: Office of the Secretary

Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human
Subjects of Research, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects 
of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm


What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important?

by David B. Resnik, J.D., Ph.D.
NIEHS.gif
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm


Questions?

Contact the IRB Executive Board at hsirb@moravian.edu